Home > 新加坡VPS > 新加坡VPS:OneAsiaHost:KVMSSD-512简单测评

新加坡VPS:OneAsiaHost:KVMSSD-512简单测评

OneAsiaHost,新加坡VPS,据说母公司是HOSTSG,今天有空购买了一款KVMSSD-512,顺便对其简单测评,需要新加坡VPS的朋友,可以参考下我的测评数据。我买的是15美金一月的,磁盘15G,SSD磁盘,流量400G/月,内存512M,SolusVM控制面板,KVM架构。

1、系统默认centos5.8,KVM需要自己安装centos,他家的KVM比别家的更干脆,压根连默认的系统都不给装好,需要自己动手安装,真正的无人管理型VPS。

[[email protected] ~]# cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m

2、双核CPU。母鸡配置:Intel Xeon E3-1245V2 3.4Ghz, 32GB RAM, 32GB RAM,但是cat /proc/cpuinfo无法显示CPU型号。

[[email protected] ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 3392.294
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 0
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm pni cx16 lahf_lm
bogomips : 6784.58

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 3392.294
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 1
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm pni cx16 lahf_lm
bogomips : 6781.92

3、磁盘15G。一般的网站也够用了。

[[email protected] ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
14G 1.4G 12G 11% /
/dev/hda1 99M 13M 82M 13% /boot
tmpfs 252M 0 252M 0% /dev/shm

4、dd测试下磁盘读写性能,比某些普通磁盘强多了。

[[email protected] ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.21648 seconds, 63.7 MB/s

5、网络入口带宽测试。官方网站写的是100Mbps共享,实际单个VPS能跑到大概30Mbps的带宽(以下是拖我日本樱花VPS上的ISO测的OneAsiaHost的入口带宽)。

HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `win2003.iso’

100%[======================================>] 686,127,104 3.83M/s in 2m 43s

2013-04-06 00:59:05 (4.01 MB/s) – `win2003.iso’ saved [686127104/686127104]

7、网络出口带宽测试,以北京联通20M光纤为例,下载OneAsiaHost上的iso文件,迅雷速度可以达到满速3MB,再看看我用日本樱花VPS下载OneAsiaHost上的ISO文件,平均速度能达到2.6MB,说明出口带宽有20Mbps。

HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `win2003.iso’

100%[======================================>] 686,127,104 3.09M/s in 4m 11s

2013-04-06 02:09:44 (2.61 MB/s) – `win2003.iso’ saved [686127104/686127104]

8、UnixBench跑分测试,结果很理想。

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: localhost.localdomain: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-308.el5 — #1 SMP Tue Feb 21 20:05:41 EST 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (6784.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (6781.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
23:12:43 up 34 min, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.12, 0.09; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 05 2013 23:12:43 – 23:40:56
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 14364230.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2951.1 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3188.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 463153.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 140569.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1364052.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 898007.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 92888.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19209.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5013.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1234.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 953981.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14364230.2 1230.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2951.1 536.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 3188.5 741.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 463153.8 1169.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 140569.4 849.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1364052.6 2351.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 898007.8 721.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 92888.3 232.2
Process Creation 126.0 19209.5 1524.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5013.4 1182.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1234.3 2057.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 953981.0 636.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 936.0

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 05 2013 23:40:56 – 00:09:09
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26216717.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5755.1 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9242.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 342387.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 91222.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 991729.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1634528.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 579986.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 33611.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8855.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1492.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1763464.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26216717.3 2246.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5755.1 1046.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 9242.3 2149.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 342387.5 864.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 91222.7 551.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 991729.0 1709.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1634528.6 1313.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 579986.0 1450.0
Process Creation 126.0 33611.0 2667.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8855.7 2088.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1492.9 2488.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1763464.7 1175.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1498.1

9、ping.chinaz.com超极ping测试。还是以北京联通为例79ms:

Pinging 116.251.210.58 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 116.251.210.58: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53
Reply from 116.251.210.58: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=53
Reply from 116.251.210.58: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53
Reply from 116.251.210.58: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 116.251.210.58:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 79ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 79ms

hostsg-ping


若非注明,本博客内容均为原创或翻译自Linode Library,教程默认Centos为linux发行版,转载请注明转自linode中文教程www.linode.im。linode中文教程QQ群:185393826,一起讨论linode及linux,linode中文教程、linode代购、linode合租、linode推介、linode返佣、linode优惠。日本VPS、美国VPS、海外独立服务器代购均在linode.im。

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.