Archive

Archive for the ‘中国VPS’ Category

腾讯云1核最低配云主机简单测评

September 15th, 2015 No comments

qqyun1

随着海外主机打压力度的加大,本来是想准备弄个国内云主机的代理的,后来看了下代理商政策,比较繁琐。看来国内云主机商主要走的路线是自销路线。不过还是简单测评下腾讯的云主机。印象比较深刻的是,他家的磁盘IO比较给力。如果不是国内备案比较复杂,将来规模应该会非常大。除了备案这个瓶颈以外,国内的带宽费用比较贵。

以下是腾讯云简单的参数:

1、默认的centos 6 32bit:

root@115.159.42.32’s password:
[root@VM_41_31_centos ~]# cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m

[root@VM_41_31_centos ~]# uname -a
Linux VM_41_31_centos 2.6.32-504.el6.i686 #1 SMP Wed Oct 15 03:02:07 UTC 2014 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

Read more…

Categories: 中国VPS Tags:

买了1个月的阿里云55元VPS体验下

January 4th, 2014 1 comment

最近考虑上公司站,想找个国内VPS,备案下,正规运营,找到了阿里云,今天买了一款55元/月的,先体验下。

Read more…

Categories: 中国VPS Tags:

电信通宵云最低配VPS安装windows教程

June 24th, 2013 4 comments

dxt-1

进入VPS面板,点:创建云主机。

dxt-2

选择你需要的windows主机,然后点完成。

Read more…

电信通VPS带宽5M升级至10M价格不变

September 10th, 2012 No comments

电信通VPS带宽5M升级至10M价格不变,附电信通VPS价格表。

超低价57折团购三款电信通VPS云主机,免费备案

August 8th, 2012 No comments

本次老易发起电信通VPS团购为小规模团购,团购VPS金额达到1万元,团购活动即宣布结束,本次团购的电信通VPS,如果大家需要装linux系统及环境搭建,老易免费提供一次服务,至于win主机,团购的朋友自己可以操作添加已经搭建好了的windows server2003。电信通VPS免费备案接入。

云博士主机-比独立服务器使用更方便的云主机!

国内独家使用云博士管理平台方案,远程遥控式系统层管理,快速自动系统备份恢复,完全虚拟化、自主化云主机。详见官方网站:http://www.netcn.net/cloudhosting_d.asp

附近期我对电信通VPS的测试:

UnixBench测试电信通云VPS凌云I型与linode512对比

电信通云博士VPS控制面板教程

测试了一款电信通的VPS主机[附价格表]

电信通VPS凌云普及型团购,原价3500元/年,团购价2000元一年,.571折。

CPU: Intel XEON E5620 2.40GHz 双核
内存:1.5G DDRIII
硬盘: 100G SATA + 100G 备份
网卡: 千兆网卡
带宽: 4MB
机房: 鹏博士酒仙桥数据中心(亚洲最大机房)
带宽: BGP多线 千兆光纤独享
IP地址: 独立公网IP地址1个(可增值)
完全自定义操作系统,独立服务器的强大又兼具云计算的稳定。

电信通VPS凌云I型团购,原价4000元/年,团购价2300元一年,..575折。

CPU:Intel XEON E5620 2.40GHz四核
内存:2G DDRIII
硬盘: 160G SATA + 160G 备份
网卡: 千兆网卡
机房: 鹏博士酒仙桥数据中心(亚洲最大机房)
带宽: BGP多线 千兆光纤独享5M
IP地址: 独立公网IP地址1个(可增值)
完全自定义操作系统,独立服务器的强大又兼具云计算的稳定。

电信通内部定制VPS,年付850元。 

单核CPU,512M内存,40G磁盘,独享2M带宽。

UnixBench测试电信通云VPS凌云I型与linode512对比

August 7th, 2012 2 comments

UnixBench见:http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/

Linux VPS性能测试软件UnixBench见 http://www.truevue.org/vps/unixbench-performance-test

安装UnixBench:

wget -c http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz

tar zxvf UnixBench5.1.3.tgz

cd UnixBench

make

./Run

下面附UnixBench测试电信通云博士VPS凌云I型与linode512测试结果,两款测试的vps均安装干净的centos5.6,并且yum update到最新。

测试结果/VPS型号电信通云博士VPS凌云I型linode512
CPU4核4核
内存2G512M
磁盘160G20G
带宽独享5M千兆共享
价格年付2300元(代理价格)年付1378元
UnixBench分值966.51138.0

通过结果可以对比价值2300元的电信通云博士VPS凌云1型主机和价值1378元的linode512,哪个性价比最高?显然目前linode还是首选,不过对于需要备案的朋友可以考虑下国内的电信通。

Linode512的UnixBench测试分值:1138

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: li493-107: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.4.2-linode44 — #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:04:46 EDT 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
05:08:02 up 28 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.20, 0.25, 0.22; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 07 2012 05:08:02 – 05:35:57
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        8125374.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1905.1 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1165.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        324945.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           84907.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        904798.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              471276.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  26616.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2434.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2853.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    831.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         388618.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    8125374.0    696.3
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1905.1    346.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1165.5    271.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     324945.6    820.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      84907.0    513.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     904798.4   1560.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     471276.0    378.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      26616.7     66.5
Process Creation                                126.0       2434.3    193.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2853.0    672.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        831.8   1386.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     388618.9    259.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         438.5

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 07 2012 05:35:57 – 06:03:58
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       25886218.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     6462.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3985.6 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        532401.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          135810.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1579419.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1574310.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 186292.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6540.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6645.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    945.9 lpm   (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1289744.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   25886218.2   2218.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6462.2   1174.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3985.6    926.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     532401.5   1344.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     135810.6    820.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1579419.3   2723.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1574310.1   1265.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     186292.4    465.7
Process Creation                                126.0       6540.8    519.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6645.4   1567.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        945.9   1576.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1289744.1    859.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1138.0

 

电信通云博士VPS凌云1型UnixBench测试分值:966.5

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: localhost.localdomain: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-238.el5 — #1 SMP Thu Jan 13 16:24:47 EST 2011
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4800.2 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4813.6 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4801.4 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 3: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4799.2 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
09:08:23 up  1:33,  2 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.12, 0.65; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 07 2012 09:08:23 – 09:36:45
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        5696709.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1321.6 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                                906.4 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        167633.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           44659.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        480707.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              272441.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  13538.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               5680.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2395.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    841.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         458295.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    5696709.3    488.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1321.6    240.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0        906.4    210.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     167633.7    423.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      44659.2    269.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     480707.8    828.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     272441.7    219.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      13538.1     33.8
Process Creation                                126.0       5680.7    450.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2395.5    565.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        841.8   1403.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     458295.1    305.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         333.5

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 07 2012 09:36:45 – 10:05:08
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       21225466.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     5215.7 MWIPS (10.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5525.0 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        132383.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           35876.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        455355.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1014281.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 417006.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              20402.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   7763.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1246.0 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1511095.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   21225466.6   1818.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       5215.7    948.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5525.0   1284.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     132383.7    334.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      35876.1    216.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     455355.9    785.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1014281.6    815.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     417006.9   1042.5
Process Creation                                126.0      20402.0   1619.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       7763.8   1831.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1246.0   2076.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1511095.5   1007.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         966.5

测试了一款电信通的VPS主机[附价格表]

July 18th, 2012 4 comments

今天测试了一款国内电信通的VPS主机,系统是电信通自己帮忙装的centos5.6,他们的虚拟技术采用的是vmware。下面先看看几个截图,感兴趣的朋友可以和linode做个比较,我今天测试的是电信通的一款定制vps,单核cpu,内存512M,硬盘40G,带宽为3M独享。

附电信通VPS价格表:

VPS配置/VPS型号定制VPS(win/linux)凌云主机普及型(win/linux)凌云主机I型(win/linux)
CPUIntel XEON E5620 2.40GHz 单核 Intel XEON E5620 2.40GHz 双核 Intel XEON E5620 2.40GHz 四核
内存512M DDRIII1.5G DDRIII2G DDRIII
硬盘40G SAS +40G SATA 备份100G SAS +100G SATA 备份160G SAS +160G SATA 备份
机房鹏博士酒仙桥数据中心(亚洲最大机房)鹏博士酒仙桥数据中心(亚洲最大机房)鹏博士酒仙桥数据中心(亚洲最大机房)
带宽BGP多线 千兆光纤独享2MBBGP多线 千兆光纤独享4MBBGP多线 千兆光纤独享5MB
网卡千兆网卡千兆网卡千兆网卡
IP地址独立公网IP地址1个(可增值)独立公网IP地址1个(可增值)独立公网IP地址1个(可增值)
官方年付价格仅仅接受内部定制3500元/年4000元/年
老易团购电信通价格850元/年2000元/年2300元/年
老易代理电信通价格1000元/年2200元/年2500元/年
备注:免费备案接入免费备案接入免费备案接入

网站测试地址见http://net.yqf.me,特意为电信通安装了个一个wordpress,有兴趣的朋友可以打开测试测试速度。刻意去下载了个Linode日本的测试文件,大概速度能达到平均600kb。

电信通VPS下载速度测试地址:http://net.yqf.me/100MB-netcn.bin

电信通VPS,ping ip:    118.244.0.234 

感兴趣的朋友可以联系我购买,我是电信通vps钻石代理。

从电信通vps下载Linode机房的测试文件,峰值大概1M多点,平均600kb/s。

上图cpu,单核。

Read more…