UnixBench见:http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/
Linux VPS性能测试软件UnixBench见 http://www.truevue.org/vps/unixbench-performance-test
安装UnixBench:
wget -c http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
tar zxvf UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
cd UnixBench
make
./Run
下面附UnixBench测试电信通云博士VPS凌云I型与linode512测试结果,两款测试的vps均安装干净的centos5.6,并且yum update到最新。
测试结果/VPS型号 | 电信通云博士VPS凌云I型 | linode512 | | |
CPU | 4核 | 4核 | | |
内存 | 2G | 512M | | |
磁盘 | 160G | 20G | | |
带宽 | 独享5M | 千兆共享 | | |
价格 | 年付2300元(代理价格) | 年付1378元 | | |
UnixBench分值 | 966.5 | 1138.0 | | |
通过结果可以对比价值2300元的电信通云博士VPS凌云1型主机和价值1378元的linode512,哪个性价比最高?显然目前linode还是首选,不过对于需要备案的朋友可以考虑下国内的电信通。


Linode512的UnixBench测试分值:1138
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: li493-107: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.4.2-linode44 — #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:04:46 EDT 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
05:08:02 up 28 min, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.25, 0.22; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 07 2012 05:08:02 – 05:35:57
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 8125374.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1905.1 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1165.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 324945.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 84907.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 904798.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 471276.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 26616.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2434.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2853.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 831.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 388618.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 8125374.0 696.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1905.1 346.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 1165.5 271.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 324945.6 820.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 84907.0 513.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 904798.4 1560.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 471276.0 378.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 26616.7 66.5
Process Creation 126.0 2434.3 193.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2853.0 672.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 831.8 1386.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 388618.9 259.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 438.5
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 07 2012 05:35:57 – 06:03:58
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25886218.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6462.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3985.6 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 532401.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 135810.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1579419.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1574310.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 186292.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6540.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6645.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 945.9 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1289744.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25886218.2 2218.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6462.2 1174.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 3985.6 926.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 532401.5 1344.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 135810.6 820.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1579419.3 2723.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1574310.1 1265.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 186292.4 465.7
Process Creation 126.0 6540.8 519.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6645.4 1567.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 945.9 1576.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1289744.1 859.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1138.0
电信通云博士VPS凌云1型UnixBench测试分值:966.5
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: localhost.localdomain: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-238.el5 — #1 SMP Thu Jan 13 16:24:47 EST 2011
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4800.2 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4813.6 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4801.4 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 3: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4799.2 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
09:08:23 up 1:33, 2 users, load average: 0.10, 0.12, 0.65; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 07 2012 09:08:23 – 09:36:45
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 5696709.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1321.6 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 906.4 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 167633.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 44659.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 480707.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 272441.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 13538.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5680.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2395.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 841.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 458295.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 5696709.3 488.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1321.6 240.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 906.4 210.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 167633.7 423.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 44659.2 269.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 480707.8 828.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 272441.7 219.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 13538.1 33.8
Process Creation 126.0 5680.7 450.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2395.5 565.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 841.8 1403.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 458295.1 305.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 333.5
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 07 2012 09:36:45 – 10:05:08
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21225466.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5215.7 MWIPS (10.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5525.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 132383.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 35876.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 455355.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1014281.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 417006.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 20402.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7763.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1246.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1511095.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21225466.6 1818.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5215.7 948.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 5525.0 1284.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 132383.7 334.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 35876.1 216.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 455355.9 785.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1014281.6 815.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 417006.9 1042.5
Process Creation 126.0 20402.0 1619.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7763.8 1831.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1246.0 2076.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1511095.5 1007.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 966.5
最新评论